Apostolic Movements
Posted by thinkingriddles on March 3, 2007
The New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) is a term used by Peter Wagner to describe current trends in church movements, particularly with regard to a “5-fold” ministry and church polity. These NAR movements are supposed to be led through relationships instead of structures, and generally follow the Ephesians 4:10 pattern.
This concept first emerged as part of the Latter Rain movement. The Latter Rainers had the original revelation of the “5-fold” but this began to develop in unhealthy ways as the theology of special “sons” who had special authority to “lay hands” on people to impart gifts developed.
The second incarnation of the doctrine in the Shepherding movement, where leaders of church were given a less wispy Spiritual kind of authority, and a much more formal authority over the individual believer. This ended up just as badly or worse than the original Latter Rain ideal.
The NAR is the latest attempt. Graham Cooke in his interview with the Elijah List suggests that the NAR is making the same mistakes over again. By focusing on church leadership instead of empowering the laity empires can be built, but the Kingdom itself suffers because the people are not built. I’m not against apostolic networks at all, but just the leader focused mentality that has fueled them. In fact, I think that the original Latter Rain ideal of the 5-fold was revelatory and is needed, but that we haven’t really captured the true spirit and humility of the men who started the New Testament church.
I think the idea of an NAR is on the way out, but the idea of the 5-fold is here to stay. One of the funny things about apostolic networks is that there is no official listing of them. I’m sure the inside leaders of these movements know who is who, but the average person only knows their own. So I’m just going to start compiling a list of ones I know about.
Shepherding Influenced Networks
I would generally avoid these movements with the possible exception of Dove. Depending on how deep they are in the Shepherding it’s probably not very healthy for you to be there. Regardless, it’s important to understand those with Shepherding as a significant part of their history, and therefore understanding of what a network is about, and what Christian experience is.
- Every Nation — (Formerly known as Morning Star International). I was trained in this movement, but am no longer a part. It is in many ways successor to Maranatha Campus Ministries. (A few churches were also brought in from His People in Africa). When I joined in 1998, EN was called Morning Star and had a radical flavored campus ministry. The radical atmosphere was a good thing to be around, but unfortunately some of the bad practices from Maranatha and the Shepherding Movement theology never fully went away.
- Dove Christian Fellowship — Leb by Larry Kreider. This one I think is more family oriented and less agressive. I’ve met Larry, he’s is a wonderful, humble guy. Reading the site more closely you can see that they were influenced by the Shepherding movement and went through some wilderness years, but here is one of the few groups to actually apologize and be continually transparent which is certainly a mark of real change. I would never have guess Larry came out of Shepherding based on our interaction.
- Victory Churches International - Canadian NAR type group led by founder. Now expanding to US. Talk about Covenant relationships, probably indicates Shepherding history. Also would guess mild word of faith influence.
- Bethany Cell Church Network — Bethany Cell Church Network. Follows the G12 principles, which have some of the hierarchical Shepherding errors baked in. It’s a shame because some great churches and people have been associated with this group in the past.
- Praise Chapel. - Led by Larry Neville. This was an offshoot of Wayman Mitchell’s “Potter’s House.” (or CFM). Although it was supposed to be a reformist movement it seems that the reforms only went so far. They do not appear to be as deep in the shepherding doctrine as CFM, they definitely have some abused former members out there complaining about them.
- New Covenant Ministries International – (NCMI) South Aftrican Apostolic movement started by Dudley Daniel. There are a number of disgruntled members, showing this is likely heavily shepherding influenced as well. Rob Rufus, the main New Frontiers prophet came from here originally.
Latter Rain Influenced Networks
Although the shepherding movement was influenced by the Latter Rain, not all of the Latter Rain embraced the Shepherding movement. These two networks are more directly descended from the Latter Rain
- Christian International Apostolic Network — This is Bill Hamon’s Group. It has a prophetic flavor. I attended the New England regional conference a few months ago. They really incorporated prophetic spirituality into the church in a way I found healing. Jim Davis is the current leader.
- Kingdom Community Network — aka Congress, WBN, Elijah Centre. Led by Dr. Noel Woodroffe, a black leader from Trinidad. He must be fairly influential. I had a very pleasant exchange with Davie Copp, pastor of City at the Cross, one of the key churches, which was also one of the original Latter Rain churches. Davie made clear that they do not and have never embraced the Shepherding movement or doctrine, but also explained that they have a view of authority which has some similarities. The fact that he took the time to talk with me was a very good sign, and if it were solely based on my interaction with him, I’d like to be able to recommend their network, but the queries I receive from around the world, and the testimonies on FactNet are concerning. The general principle I hold for everyone is that if where you are is not promoting your spiritual health, then leave and find a place that is.
Miscellaneous Networks
- Church on the Rock International – Looks like 300 or so churches in the US, led by someone named Dr. Lawrence Kennedy. Upcoming conferences includes T.D. Jakes, Matthew Barnett, and Joni Lamb.
- Grace Churches — Founded by Michael Fletcher. This one is more strongly Reformed in doctrine. Home Church
- International Network of Five Fold Ministries.
- Faith Christian Fellowship
- Association of Related Churches
- Evangel Fellowship International – Houston Miles
- World Harvest Church Ministerial Fellowship
Kansas City Prophetic Influenced US Networks
- The Rain Network I think I overheard someone talking about this while at The Call. Cal Pierce of the “other” John G. Lake healing room ministries is part of this group.
- The River — Bill Johnson does not have a network per se, although he has iGlobalLegacy. This is where he recommends you go if you want a network. He is on the board, but it’s currently a small CA thing, with charismatic/prophetic overtones.
- Harvest International Ministries — Led by Che Ahn, who I believe came out of the Vineyard. Campus Church Networks, is not exactly an apostolic movement that is connected to HIM.
- Partners in Harvest – Partners in Harvest network, outgrowth of the Toronto revival.
- Apostolic Network of Global Awakening — Randy Clark’s Group. I don’t know how much it qualifies as a true network of churches though.
- Fellowship of Connected Churches and Ministries – Dudley Hall
UK/Commonwealth Networks
The Apostolic movement in Britain started from the House Church Network, which was the British equivalent of the Shepherding Movement, and was founded first by 7 key leaders, and then later an additional 7. These men went on to become the foundation stones of the now burgeoning Charismatic movement in Britain. British Charismatics are different than American Charismatics. They are more Calvinistic across the board, they reject Word/Faith pretty much completely, and do not seem to have the same degree of authority problems in American churches, although I’m not completely sure. There is a book by William Kay that gives the fuller and better picture of these networks. The book is reviewed here
- Salt and Light. Led by Barney Coombs (UK)
- The Ground Level. Led by Stuart Bell (UK)
- New Community. Arose from the ashes of C.Net/Cornerstone which was led by Tony Morton. Graham Cooke was associated.
- New Frontiers — This is a British movement led by Terry Virgo. Influenced by the thought of the late Arthur Wallis. They seem to be very successful in the UK especially. Seems very solid on the Word. In general what I would call “British evangelical charismatic”
- Pioneer Network Led by Gerald Coates. That’s all I know
- Christian City Churches International. - Australian church planting movement. Their first US church is in Atlanta. I think this is the “Other” Austrailian mega-church.
- Household of Faith – Small South African Movement.
- Multiply Network, Jesus Army.
- New Day International
- Five fold Ministies International
Fellowships
These groups typically emerged out of the early phase of the Latter Rain/Healing revival. The do not propose to be apostolic networks in the same sense that the NAR groups do, providing more of a confederation model. The are however more Charismatic than the Pentecostal denominations.
- Elim Fellowship — Mike Cavanaugh is one of the key guys here. I was familiar with him from his limited contact with Every Nation. They apparently are going through a generational transition from wise senior statesmen to middle aged men. This may lead to a renewed energy and direction. Bob Mumford was originally with Elim, and now that he’s out of the Shepherding movement, he has renewed his ties to Elim.
- World Ministry Fellowship — My friend attended one of these churches. Seemed to be a pretty non-descript Charismatic group. Randy Bozarth is associated.
- The Full Gospel Fellowship — I attended a church that was a part of this fellowship. Full name is Full Gospel Fellowship of Churches and Ministries International (FGFCMI) Led by older men. Was founded by Gordon Lindsey in parallel to the Full Gospel Business Men’s Fellowship International. (FGBMFI). They are obviously easily confused.
- Ministers Fellowship International — Led by Dick Iverson. This is probably the most mature of the apostolic movements. Most of these guys have been flowing together since the Latter Rain days, some 50 years ago. Includes Frank Damazio, and famous Bible teacher Kevin J. Conner.
- WCICC — This seems to be an indigenous group that has gotten reach in the US. A friend of mine is credentialed there for possible Chaplaincy
There are others that I’ve stumbled across, but if there is no web site with a list of churches and leaders, conferences, etc, then I’m skeptical about the size/reach, etc of these groups. Some of these are
- ATNI,
- Arise the Nations International, AMI,
- Apostolic Christian Network – My friend met the leader’s brother on the plane. Apparently they have a huge number of churches in Brazil
- Apostolic Missions International (Cannistraci).
- Harvest Breakthrough Network (Bakalov).
- Emerging Church Network.
- Missional Church Network.
- Missional International Church Network.
- Church Foundation Network (Sumrall).
- Breakthrough Apostolic Ministries.
- Blended Church Network – A network specifically aimed at building racially reconciled networks (Hagan).
- Network of Christian Churches (Watson).
- Christian Renewal Internationa(Cruickshank).
- Morningstar Ministries Fellowship International — A small network in northern New England. We have visited there.
- Rock Ministerial Family Fellowship – Bishop John Gimenez
- Vanguard International – Founded by Dick Benjamin. Includes Jay Zinn of Davidson, NC
There are also a number of Evangelical Church networks in the game. Check out this page.
I’m starting to feel that I may have uncovered the major apostolic networks. A lot of the ones in the paragraph at the end are ministries around a single individual rather than a team, and it’s questionable if they will survive that person’s ministry, or if they will ever really take off. One thing becomes quite clear from examining them — you must have a team of strong men of God flowing together to build a real apostolic network. A single person does not make an apostolic network.
Here is the link where you can find all of the old school Pentecostal Denominations
Tommy said
I read about your Apostolic Network. I am planting a church and have been involved with recently GCI. That is the network by Michael Fletcher. Email me. I enjoyed these post and would like to know more about your ministry. Thanks, Tommy
John Campbell said
I’ll try again, as the link vanished into thin air.
Here is the link for the Multiply Christian Network.
Roger Bain said
There’s also the
World Harvest Church Ministerial Fellowship
http://rodparsley.com
Linda Brimmer` said
Is there any church other than the established denominaions in which e can rest assured that the pure Word of God is preached and indiviidiuals are not only prooting themselves?
Davie Copp said
Why the description of Dr. Noel Woodroffe as a ‘black man’? Is that relevant?
thinkingriddles said
Davie, Thanks for your question. No slight intended at all by identifying Dr. Woodroffe as black. I do think it is worth pointing out, however, since he is the only leader of a major apostolic movement who is. In general, I would think that is a positive thing.
Davie Copp said
No venom in the question, I just thought it interesting that he was the only one in your lists who was mentioned by race. I am part of KCN and lead the community in Long Beach CA called City At The Cross, which was formerly Bethany Chapel, the Latter Rain Church.
Interesting site, just poking around!
DFC
jerry bolton said
I’ve heard a lot of talk of Apostolic Networks, but what’s the real difference between an apostolic network and a denomination?
Either can be good or corrupted. Isn’t an apostolic network just a small “denominaton”? Some seem like it.
thinkingriddles said
The difference is that Apostolic Networks don’t believe in being a denomination. lol. Actually, I do think they are somewhat different. In a denom, your unity is more around a shared Statement of Faith. In a network, the focus is more about a shared mission or purpose. Also, there aren’t really any Charismatic denominations except perhaps the vineyard. Apostolic Networks vary quite a bit however. The Global Legacy guys we’ve met here are very different than the Every Nation guys I used to be connected to.
jerry bolton said
thanks.
But, don’t Apostolic Networks have a Statement of Faith and denoms have a shared mission or purpose(or at least appear to). Are not we all to follow the Great Commission? I’m familiar with Global Legacy and went to a conf. last Nov. at Bethel – Redding. I considered doing their LDP(Leadership Development Program), but have not as of yet.
I joined the IPHC(International Pentecostal Holiness Church) a couple years ago and was ordained July 11th. They have become very network oriented over the last decade or so. I know they have a heavy emphasis on church planting, and have for some years. As some have said, they are the least like a denomination and still a denomination of any there is. They (some time ago) changed their ‘Headquarters’ to a Resource Development Center to emphasize their perspective to support the local churches instead of the local churches supporting them. I have seen a typical(I suppose) denom when I worked with my father-in-law in the United Methodist Church.
It also seems that many are connecting with networks and still staying in their denom.
good to hear form you. i’ve got some other questions – but later.
jerry
Nelson said
It is really interesting. The Apostolic Network Vs Denomination thing. Should we further probe into it? Is it just the difference of gathering around a “thing” (statement of faith or purpose)? Or is there more to it?
Can anyone answer please?
thinkingriddles said
Nelson, Great question. You are right that many have argued that the key difference between Apostolic networks and denominations is whether it is “relationship based” or “doctrine based.” In my experience most apostolic networks are built around a strong personality. This means they rise and fall with the person. When the person falls, moves on or dies, it becomes something else. This may actually be OK. It means that churches feel more free to “follow the cloud” of God’s leading at the time.
For example, many of the guys now following Bill Johnson and Bethel are guys that originally followed John Wimber in the Vineyard. They feel free to go with what they see God doing now. To the extent that Apostolic Networks promote organic “bottom up” activity, they promote freedom and growth. To the extent that they promote control by a single leader I think they can slow growth, in just the same way that a denomination slows growth by instituting a hierarchy.