Church Revolution

Write a new future for God

Part XIV – What is a Cult?

Posted by thegonetwork on March 23, 2008

The term “cult” is one of those words that gets filled with meanings that vary widely depending on who is using it and in what context. Although some have used the term as simply a way of labeling those on the fringes, I believe that there are important sociological and spiritual patterns that form a true cult.

First off, let me say that being in a cult is not about doctrine, and it’s not even exclusively religious in nature. Being in a cult is about being robbed of personal freedom and morality by a demonic system. In fact, I would go so far as to say that a cult is simply a manifestation of the devil’s Kingdom on earth. The devil will try to set them up wherever he can and make them as large as possible. Therefore the the demonic patterns described by the word “cult” apply regardless of scale.

  • The cult could be national: Both Communism and Nazism were cults which robbed entire regions of personal freedom and morality.
  • The cult could be a relgious group within a free society.
  • Abusive/Dysfunctional families are microcosms of a cult. Personal abuse lacks many of the larger sociological elements of cults, the basic psychology of fear is the same.

The goal of any of these situations is to isolate, control, and destroy people, and the same psychological levers are used to make it happen. Here are some features that I see as indicative:

  • A militant corporate goal. The physical establishment of the “Kingdom” is a key uniting feature. Even political cults are based on some kind of millennial vision. Hitler wanted to restore the German people and purge the earth from what he saw as everything impure. Communism was to free the workers around the world.
  • Elitism. The cult believes they they are the best of any comparable group because they are the ones who are really pursuing the pure vision that no one else is. Religiously this leads to doubting the salvation of other more mainstream groups and eventually moves from thinking they are just the BEST to thinking that they are the ONLY group with the truth.
  • “Enemies” — associated with its elitism and corporate goal, every cult must have enemies. These enemies are often phantoms of the imagination of the leadership, and when they are not, they are enemies created by the sinful behavior of the leaders. These “enemies” serve as the explanation for bad things that happen, as well as why everyone must stick closer and closer together and only obey the leader.
  • It’s own historiography. The cult will have its own version of history to support both it’s future goal and its elite status. The radical fundamentalist Baptists for example have a story which explains why they are the only true church.
  • Exaltation of a single person. Within a cult, although it may start around an ideal, a single person always gets more and more power, and this power is used to implement the other aspects.
  • No Freedom of Speech. In a cult there are always things you are not allowed to say or talk about. Sometimes pastors use sermons on “gossip” to shut down the freedom of speech of the parishoners. A pastor has a sin and it has been discovered, so rather than repent, he admonishes the people not to gossip. In the meantime he gossips by gathering all of his allies together to support him and attack those who are bothered by the situation. If they accept it, it sets up a culture where people are not comfortable with telling the truth.
  • Inability to leave. This develops over time. Sometimes the barrier is physical, but often times it is mostly psychological: If you leave you will lose your salvation, your family relationships, your friends, etc.
  • Summary Excommunication. Those who they cannot keep silent or who refuse to obey must be either killed or disfellowshiped immediately. So basically the plan is to keep you from leaving, and if you cause trouble take you out.

Many Christian groups that are not cults exhibit some degree of this behavior in the early and milder stages. If you are in a position to influence the direction away from these tendencies you should do so before things get worse, otherwise take it as a warning and get out. There are always several groups of people associated with the cult:

  • The committed. The core of the cult is those who have no morality except advancement of the cult. This minority is what makes it work.
  • The promoters. Unlike the committed, the promoters are not “in on” the sin in the system, and unlike the compromisers, they are not particularly bothered by what is going on. Instead they are tied in because of relationship. They “trust” and “believe in” the leader or leaders in the committed circle and that is enough for them to basically be blind to anything that occurs. When a victim raises their hand, the promoters basically rally to the defense of the committed almost in spite of any evidence that can be presented.
  • The compromisers. This is a group who sees flaws with the cult but are still proponents because of what they see as the good things about it. These people can be some of the most dangerous because they form an important link between the committed, and the victims.
  • The validators. These are people outside the system who are used or manipulated by the committed to legitimize the activity of the cult. They are not exposed to all of the problems but are deceived by the leaders into thinking everything is OK. They might be brought into participate in some way or just referenced as a sympathetic voice.
  • The victims. Every cult has victims. The system is designed such that the victims cannot speak out. Their testimony may be discredited, or their abuse is legitimized, or they are just reduced to non-human status.
  • The escapees. These people have managed to escape the power of the cult and are calling it out for what it is. They fight it from the outside. They can come from either the compromisers or the victim groups originally. Compromisers reach a point where they “see the light,” and victims reach a point where they have had enough. When a committed person defects it is almost always to take over the cult or start a new one.
  • “Persecutors” — The often imaginary people who are “out to get” the cult because they have some kind of “agenda.”

Basically the way the devil takes people out is by isolating them. Start with the weak, and blame them for their faults. They “deserve it” for some reason. In the process everyone else in the system becomes more corrupt. Deceive, Isolate, and Destroy.

My wife made an interesting point too about how this happens invisibly The deeper you are in the cult (the higher on the list) the more layers you are aware of. The people at the bottom tend to see everyone above them on the list as a monolithic group. The people near the top tend to realize that there are other groups less committed than themselves.

7 Responses to “Part XIV – What is a Cult?”

  1. beatthedrum said

    A well reasoned article.

    Would you say that the ‘shepherding’ charismatics of the 1980′s and 1990′s were a cult or cult ‘like’ in their use of authority over the congregations?

  2. I was trained in a church with Shepherding movement influence. While most Shepherding influenced churches never reached what I would call full cult status, some probably did, and I would say most exhibited cultish features.

    For example, watching the documentary “Jonestown” recently about Jim Jones and their pseudo-Pentecostal cult with a friend, we saw the same patterns that we had experienced in the church, just at a whole different level. So my post was about trying to discern what those patterns are.

    I think what the generally well intentioned leaders of the Shepherding movement did not realize was that their theology was going to lead to all of these cult like tendencies. They were trying to correct authority problems in the church, and they basically recreated the structure of the medeival Catholic church.

  3. beatthedrum said

    I was saved into a ‘shepherding’ church and three years later the congregation threw off the ‘shepherding’ which broke the church in half. This was over the shepherding that was taking place by one elder in particular. The ‘stream’ we were part of did not know how to cope with it and decided to split the church in half. Using Barnabus and Paul as excampled of when this had happened in the bible, which was tosh!

    As this was happening i was leaving the city to wed my wife and we joined a church in her city. We felt called back to my ‘home’ church 6 years later. It was still in mourning and hurting from the split. Numbering only about 40 people (the pre split church had over 300 people in it (a big church for the UK at the time)and had planted 3 other churches), the church was limping along. The church left the stream they were part of and joined a different one, one more based on Grace than shepherding / legalism. This has been a great blessing to the church.

    However we have seen Father move powerfully and we are back where we were pre split in terms of numbers, vision and mission. We have kept the ‘Charismatic’ element of our vision alive and healthy and I think that has helped us along the road. With Prophecy, words of Wisdom, Words of Knowledge, Healings etc encouraging the church and moving us on.

    The other side of the ‘split’ is also doing well (if you joined the two congregations together there has been an 120% growth mostly from newly saved people). They have not grown so much as they themselves had another minor split and during non term time (this is a big university city) there numbers shrink significantly. To cater for the students they have toned down the Charismatic element of what they do as the majority of the students are uncomfortable with it. God is blessing them as well.

    After all God turns all things to good for those who believe in him!

  4. Thanks for sharing. Your experience with the Shepherding influence is very similar to mine. It has definitely acted like a “wild boar” in the Lord’s vineyard and brought some terrible behavior out of people who would have been fruitful.

  5. globalrevival said

    thats funny, I was wondering exactly what a cult was!
    I had someone call the church plant I’m involved with a cult. Now that I actually know exactly what a cult is , they look even more ignorant then they did at first.

  6. thinkingriddles said

    Globalrevival – I do want to stress that this is my personalized definition of a cult based on experience and observation. I think it improves on the mainstream usage of the term, but it is a bit different. As I mention, people mean a lot of different things when they say cult.

    But the one thing I would ask yourself is “why does this person think I’m in a cult?” My own life experience tells me that that often means there is some aspect of what you are a part of that may be a little off. My parents thought I was in a cult, and I wasn’t, but there were cult-like issues going on which I didn’t see until I left.

  7. beatthedrum said

    Let me tell you a tale.

    I was saved into a Charismatic Restorational Church when i was 19. My father who was of a ‘high’ Church of England (thick catholic but with no pope, Mary or saints) back ground and persuasion thought i had joined a cult. This was because we raised our hands in worship, danced!!, spoke in ongues believed the gifts of the spirit were for today and that you had to be ‘born -again’ to be a christian and that you were not one because you were english and had been brought up in the CofE.

    My father was badly disabled and unable to attend the local CofE services so the curate used to come around and give him communion. My dad thought this curate was the bees knees! He told the curate that I had joined a ‘CULT’ giving the reasons stated before.

    The curate laughed at him, then told him that the church i was going to was probably the most blessed in the region by God and that they attened there on their sundays off so they could experience God, be refreshed in the spirit and find the strength to persevere in God’s chosen path for them.

    Just a cautionary tale as i am hearing similar things being said about some of the emerging church stuff in the US.

    Dont kmow enough to comment about them though

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: